Paxton told a Texas NBC affiliate that he has not discussed a possible pardon with Trump. Paxton is under an FBI investigation for misuse of office to help a wealthy donor. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is leading the legal challenge, has serious personal legal troubles, leading to speculation that he’s trying to ingratiate himself with Trump in hopes of securing a presidential pardon. From the brief, it looks like a fella begging for a pardon filed a PR stunt rather than a lawsuit - as all of its assertions have already been rejected by federal courts and Texas’ own solicitor general isn’t signing on,” Sasse said in a statement. “I’m not a lawyer, but I suspect the Supreme Court swats this away. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), another member of the Judiciary Committee, also predicted the Supreme Court would dismiss the case. “This is a press release masquerading as a lawsuit,” Hasen said. He added in a post on the Election Law Blog that the remedy Texas is seeking would require the unconstitutional disenfranchisement of tens of millions of voters. Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, said that among other major defects, the legal challenge hinges on Texas’s authority to litigate how other states conduct their elections - a power the state lacks, according to Hasen. That view is shared by a number of election law experts who have panned the lawsuit as far-fetched and unserious, and having little chance of succeeding in its quest to change the election result. “Obviously the ones that have been made have not proven effective, leading to this novel approach.”Ĭornyn predicted the Supreme Court won’t agree with Texas attorney general’s arguments. “If people do have constitutional challenges, the place to make those are in their respective states,” he said. “I’m not sure where that theory leads,” he said, raising the possibility of states raising future legal challenges against a variety of other states’ laws.Ĭornyn said states should maintain sovereignty over their own election laws. He and Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (Wyo.), the third-ranking House Republican, did not sign the amicus brief, but Minority Whip Steve Scalise (La.), the second-ranking GOP lawmaker in the House, and Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio), the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, did attach their names.Ĭornyn, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said he’s worried the case being brought by Texas and backed by President Trump plus 18 other GOP state attorneys general could open the door to unintended consequences House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), the top-ranking Republican in the lower chamber, declined to comment about the lawsuit when asked about it multiple times Thursday. I doubt the Supreme Court will take it up,” he said. “I just don’t know why a state like Texas which never wants anybody telling them what to do, now wants to tell a bunch of other states how to run their elections. Senate Republican Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) said Thursday he agrees with Cornyn’s concerns. If you can do it for the election, you can do it if somebody wanted to challenge, for example, Texas law on the Second Amendment,” he said. I don’t want other states having a chance to change Texas law based on a similar effort. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said he was puzzled by the legal theory behind the challenge.Ĭornyn, a former Texas Supreme Court justice, said it’s inappropriate for states to interfere in the laws of other states. Senior Republican lawmakers are expressing serious misgivings about a lawsuit the Republican attorney general of Texas is leading against the election results in four swing states, reflecting deep divisions in the party over the legal strategy.Įven as more than 100 House Republicans on Thursday signed an amicus brief in support of the Texas lawsuit aimed at overturning the election results in four swing states, Sen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |